1. Home
  2. Public Health
  3. Environmental Health
  4. Aboriginal
  5. Housing for Health
Print this page Reduce font size Increase font size

Housing for Health

What is Housing for Health? | Housing for Health Priorities | Housing for Health Process | Housing for Health Projects in NSW

What is Housing for Health?

Housing for Health is a copyright methodology for improving living conditions in Aboriginal communities. It was initially developed in the late 1980s in the far north west of South Australia. The group that came to be known as Healthabitat® set about developing a methodology that focused on environmental changes that would lead to maximum health gains, particularly for children aged 0-5 years.
 
Research has shown that improving essential health hardware (fixing a leaking toilet, electrical repairs, having sufficient hot water, having somewhere to wash a baby or child, etc.) can lead to improvements in health status and reduce the risk of disease and injury.

Housing for Health Priorities

The Housing for Health process aims to assess, repair or replace health hardware so that houses are safe and the occupants have the ability to carry out healthy living practices (HLPs).

All works carried out in the Housing for Health program are prioritised in terms of health benefit. The priorities are:

  • Safety - Immediate life threatening dangers, particularly electrical, gas, fire, sewage and structural safety issues are addressed as the highest priority.
  • Healthy Living Practices - After safety issues have been addressed, the prioritised list below of Healthy Living Practices from 1 (most important) to 9 provides a focus for prioritising repair and maintenance:
  1. Washing people - ensuring there is adequate hot and cold water and that the shower and bath work.
  2. Washing clothes and bedding - ensuring the laundry is functional with separate taps for waste for the washing machine and tub.
  3. Removing waste safely - ensuring drains aren't blocked and that the toilets are working.
  4. Improving nutrition - assessing the ability to prepare and store food, making sure the stove works and improving the functionality of the kitchen.
  5. Reducing overcrowding - ensuring health hardware (particularly hot water systems and septic systems) can cope with the actual number of people living in a house at any time.
  6. Reducing the impact of animals, vermin or insects - on the health of people, for example, ensuring adequate insect screening.
  7. Reducing dust - to reduce the risk of respiratory illness.
  8. Controlling temperature - looking at the use of insulation and passive design to reduce the health risks, particularly to small children, the sick and the elderly.
  9. Reducing trauma - being non-life threatening issues.

References:

Pholeros, Paul; Rianow, Stephan; Torzillo, Paul. (1993). Housing for Health: Towards a Health Living Environment for Aboriginal Australia. Healthabitat: Newport Beach, NSW.

Department of Family and Community Services (2003). National Indigenous Housing Guide (2nd edition) Commonwealth of Australia: Canberra.

These principles are also adopted by the National Framework for Design, Construction and Maintenance of Indigenous Housing including the National Indigenous Housing Guide (2nd edition).

The first four points are considered critical healthy living practices, as they are essential for people to be able to practice healthy living. Most of the works carried out as part of this program focus on safety and these top four healthy living practices.

Housing for Health Process

The Housing for Health process consists of six main stages:

  1. Community consultation
  2. Feasibility study
  3. First survey and fix (SF1) (including training)
  4. Capital upgrade
  5. Second survey and fix (SF2)
  6. Reporting and closure

Community Consultation
The community consultation is an important part of the Housing for Health process, because the program only repairs or replaces items specifically related to safety and health, and the actual survey can be quite intrusive. It is important to clarify expectations with the community so that people are as aware of what the program doesn't deliver, as much as what it does. For example the program will cover most plumbing and electrical issues (as they relate to health and safety), but doesn't extend to painting or other aesthetic works.

It is at this stage that the community agrees to whether it wants a Housing for Health project or not.

Feasibility Study
If the community agrees to a Housing for Health project, the project manager undertakes a feasibility study with the housing provider. It is at this stage the logistics of running the project are worked out (access to the community, availability of local trades etc.) as well as the detail of the project, such as the number of houses to be included (some tenants may choose not to be involved), the general condition of the houses and plumbing, and the type of sewerage disposal.

At this stage each house to be included in the project is given a Housing for Health number that is different to the street address to ensure confidentiality.

Survey Fix 1
If, after stages 1 and 2, the community agrees to receive the program then a first survey/fix (SF1) is scheduled. This consists of a comprehensive survey of around 240 items in all houses in the community. The surveys are carried out by teams of around four people (usually three community people and a technical support person), and the first day is designated to training the teams in the testing, recording and if possible, repair of those items. There is a standardised test for each item and the information is recorded on survey sheets. Survey teams also have a toolbox with them and any minor repairs not requiring a licensed trade are done on the spot. On average it takes around 45 minutes to an hour to complete one house.

The completed surveys are then taken back to a central point in the community where the information from the surveys is then entered into a database, which takes about 5-10 minutes. Once entered into the database a list of prioritised works required for each house is printed out for each trade (plumber, electrician etc). The trades usually start about half a day behind the teams so they have enough work when they begin. The community are involved in the selection of trades and where possible, local and/or Aboriginal trades are used.

The trades report back to the project manager on the work carried out, and also the reason for the problem (i.e. routine maintenance, faulty or damaged). This information is noted in the database. The database becomes the tool for managing the project.

Capital Upgrade
There are often works identified at Survey Fix 1 that are too big to fix on the spot (such as rewiring a house), or require the replacement of particular items in a number of houses (such as stoves or hot water systems) and may need to be put out to tender.

These larger and more time-consuming works form the basis for a scope of works for the capital upgrade component. From this information, the design, specification and schedule of works are developed. Work included in the capital upgrade component is completed between the first and second survey/fix. This can take around six to nine months depending on community size.

As with the survey fix stages, all works are prioritised in accordance with the Housing for Health Priorities.

Survey Fix 2
A second survey/fix is carried out following the capital upgrade. This uses the same process as the first survey fix, and addresses any works that may have either been missed at the first survey and upgrade or arisen since. The second survey also provides a comparison of house function at the first survey.

Reporting and Closure
Once any work identified at the second survey fix is completed a report of the work done to each house by each trade is provided to the community housing provider. In some cases it is also possible to provide a list of works that the project was unable to cover within the budget, but would recommend for inclusion in any future programs the community may run. Again these are prioritised in terms of safety and the nine healthy living practices.

Housing for Health Projects in NSW

In 1997, a trial of Housing for Health was undertaken in Muli Muli in the far north of NSW. This was funded by an interagency forum, the Aboriginal Environmental Health Infrastructure Forum.

Since 1997, NSW Health has delivered 35 Housing for Health projects with communities across NSW under different programs.

Projects are currently being developed under two programs: the Aboriginal Communities Development Program (ACDP) and the Fixing Houses for Better Health Program.

Both these programs use the same methodology but are funded from different sources. They are delivered through the public health units in regional Area Health Services.

The projects are only delivered in housing owned by community housing providers. It does not extend to other government housing which has its own programs for repair and maintenance.

Aboriginal Communities Development Program (ACDP)
NSW Health has a Partnership Agreement with the NSW Department of Aboriginal Affairs (DAA) to deliver the Housing for Health© program as part of the Aboriginal Communities Development Program (ACDP). The ACDP is a capital works program to upgrade living conditions in Aboriginal communities. The Program is investing $200 million over eight years to raise the health and living standards of selected, priority Aboriginal communities where major environmental health needs have been identified.

NSW Health has committed approximately $2 million over fours years to manage the delivery of Housing for Health under this program. The ACDP provides the funds for the actual work required in the houses for each of the projects.

Between 1998 and 2003, 20 community projects have been done under this program. During 2002/03, work was carried out in 12 communities: Boggabilla, Toomelah, Mungindi, Walcha, Box Ridge, Bowraville, Macksville, Cummeragunja, Coomaditchie, Orient Point, Lightning Ridge and Collarenebri. The next round of Housing for Health projects begins in 2003/04.

Fixing Houses for Better Health (FHBH)
The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission (ATSIC), the NSW Aboriginal Housing Office (AHO) and NSW Health funded the Fixing Houses for Better Health Project (FHBH) in 191 houses in eight communities being Goulburn, Queanbeyan, Yass, Moruya, Narooma, Bodalla, Bega and Eden. The project uses the same Housing for Health process to address health issues associated with poor housing conditions. The source of the funding is the only main difference.

The Commonwealth Department of Family and Community Services continues to administer the Fixing Houses for Better Health Program nationally.

AHO Murdi Paaki Trial
In 1999/00 and 2000/01, the NSW Aboriginal Housing Office funded a trial in six communities in the Murdi Paaki ATSIC region in the far west of NSW. The communities were Enngonia, Weilmoringle, Ivanhoe, Dareton, Gulargambone and Coonamble. This project used the same Housing for Health methodology and was managed by the Far West Area Health Service.

Other Projects
NSW Health also received some special project funding to carry out a Housing for Health project in Karuah in 1999/00.

Print this page Reduce font size Increase font size